Skip to Main Content
A-Z Index
Center for Instruction and Research Technology
oneColumn

AI vs. Traditional Technology in Education

Back to AI Faculty Information Hub

Traditional AI in Education | Generative AI in Education | Strategic Use in Course Design | Benefits and Risks in Higher Education

Understanding the distinction between traditional AI and generative AI is essential for faculty looking to thoughtfully integrate these tools into their teaching. Both types of AI offer powerful capabilities, but they serve different purposes and require different instructional strategies. Knowing when and how to use each can help faculty design learning experiences that are both innovative and aligned with course goals.

osprey bird logo

Traditional AI in Education

ai technology chip icon

Traditional artificial intelligence focuses on prediction, classification, and automation. These systems rely on structured, labeled data to identify patterns, make decisions, and execute predefined tasks. In education, traditional AI applications include: 

  • Predicting student performance based on attendance, assignment scores, or LMS activity 
  • Flagging at-risk students for early intervention 
  • Automating tasks such as grading multiple-choice assessments or sorting student work 

These models are typically more transparent and interpretable, making it easier for educators to understand how decisions are being made. They also require fewer computing resources and can be implemented effectively using smaller datasets. Because they are rule-based and optimized for efficiency, traditional AI is ideal for streamlining operational and assessment-related tasks that are repetitive or data-driven.

Generative AI in Education

In contrast, generative AI goes beyond prediction to create entirely new content based on patterns learned from massive datasets. These tools, such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and DALL·E can: 

  • Generate unique quiz or discussion questions. 
  • Draft writing prompts or lesson outlines. 
  • Create sample student responses for modeling. 
  • Provide initial feedback on student writing based on a prompt. 

Unlike traditional AI, generative AI works in a probabilistic and non-deterministic way—meaning the same prompt can produce different responses each time. These tools often function as “black boxes,” with internal processes that are complex and not easily understood. Because they are typically trained on massive datasets using cloud-based infrastructure, they require significant computing power. Users interact with generative AI through natural language prompts, making the ability to craft clear, effective instructions—known as prompt engineering—an essential skill for faculty exploring these tools in teaching.

ai nucleus filled

Strategic Use in Course Design

coursework being created on laptop

The decision to use traditional vs. generative AI should be guided by the pedagogical purpose: 

  • Use traditional AI when the goal is analysis, efficiency, early alerts, or pattern recognition. 
  • Use generative AI when the goal is creativity, ideation, feedback, or content creation. 

These tools are not mutually exclusive. In fact, they can complement each other. For example, a course might use traditional AI to monitor learning analytics while using generative AI to help students brainstorm topics for a writing assignment. By understanding their distinct roles, faculty can integrate AI more strategically and responsibly to support deeper learning.

Benefits and Risks of AI in Higher Education

The use of AI in higher education is rapidly expanding—opening the door to personalized instruction, increased efficiency, and new modes of engagement. But alongside these opportunities come risks that must be carefully managed through ethical policies, thoughtful course design, and ongoing faculty development. As educators explore AI’s potential, understanding both the benefits and the challenges is essential for responsible, effective use in the classroom and beyond.

  • 1. Personalized Learning

    AI-powered platforms can adapt learning paths in real time, providing students with content, feedback, and support that matches their individual pace, preferences, and performance. Tools like intelligent tutoring systems and adaptive assessments can boost engagement, reduce frustration, and make learning more equitable by meeting students where they are.

  • 2. Administrative Efficiency

    AI can automate repetitive or time-consuming tasks such as grading, scheduling, and generating progress reports which can free faculty time for more meaningful work with students. This shift allows instructors to focus more on teaching, mentoring, and supporting student success.

  • 3. Enhanced Content and Engagement

    Generative AI can create dynamic educational materials such as interactive simulations, practice quizzes, writing samples, and visuals that support creativity and deeper understanding. These tools can also help faculty rapidly prototype lessons or adapt materials for different learners.

  • 4. Accessibility and Inclusion

    AI-driven tools like automated captioning, real-time translation, text-to-speech, and content reformatting can help remove barriers for students with disabilities or diverse linguistic backgrounds. This fosters a more inclusive learning environment and ensures content reaches all learners.

  • 5. Actionable Insights Through Analysis

    AI-powered dashboards can help faculty track student engagement and performance in real time, identify at-risk students, and make informed decisions to personalize support or adjust instruction early.

  • 1. Data Privacy and Security

    AI tools often require large amounts of personal data to function effectively. Without strong institutional protections in place, student information could be at risk of misuse or breach. Faculty should be aware of what data is collected and how it's stored or shared.

  • 2. Algorithmic Bias and Fairness

    If an AI model is trained on biased data, it can replicate or even amplify inequalities, impacting areas such as grading, admissions, or student recommendations. Faculty and institutions must work proactively to ensure transparency and fairness in AI-driven decisions.

  • 3. Over-Reliance and Reduced Critical Thinking

    When students lean too heavily on AI tools for generating content or solving problems, it can hinder the development of essential academic skills like reasoning, analysis, and originality. Faculty play a key role in guiding students to use AI ethically and thoughtfully—as a support, not a substitute.

  • 4. Academic Integrity

    Generative AI tools can make it difficult to distinguish between student work and AI-generated content, raising concerns about plagiarism and integrity. Educators may need to redesign assignments, adjust grading practices, and build trust-based learning communities that encourage authentic work.

  • 5. Loss of Human Connection and Job Displacement

    AI lacks the empathy, context, and nuance that human instructors bring. While helpful, these tools should never replace the role of the educator in creating a relational and supportive learning experience. There are also concerns about automation displacing faculty or staff roles, especially in routine areas.