|
Science
Methods: Elementary
|
|
Date |
Topic |
Reading
Assignment |
Assignment Due
|
|
8/27 |
Introductions,
Nature of Science and the Science Teacher, Science Literacy and
Habits of Mind, Learning Cycle |
SFAC Chp 1
& 3, FCF Chp 1 SFAA Chp 1 |
|
|
9/3 |
Misconceptions,
Discrepant Events, Predict-Observe-Explain, Demonstrations, Play |
SFAC Chapter
2 FCF chapter 2 SFAA Chp 10 |
Online
forum |
|
9/10 |
Critical
Thinking, Problem Solving, Concept Maps |
SFAC chapter
7 FCF chapter 3
SFAA Chp 11 |
Bring an item
for teaching science |
|
9/17 |
Moral, Legal
and Ethical Issues, Safety Adapting
Instruction for Inclusion and Exceptional Education |
FCF Intro
& chapter 4, SFAC chapter
6 SFAA Chp 12 |
Online forum 2 |
|
9/24 |
Reading in the Content Area |
SFAA
Chp 13 |
Autumnal
Equinox (9/21) |
|
10/1 |
Resources for
Science Searching and
Researching |
SFAC chapter
10 |
Concept map
due |
|
10/8 |
Media: Video,
Literature, & More ACEE
Reading and Writing Naturally |
FCF chapter 5 |
|
|
10/15 |
National and
State Science Goals, Standards, and Benchmarks ACEE FCAT |
|
Issue paper
or |
|
10/22 |
Technology |
SFAC chapter
11 SFAA Chp 3 |
Online forum |
|
10/29 |
Discipline,
Questioning, Inquiry, Grouping, Constructivism |
SFAC chapters
4 & 8 |
|
|
11/5 |
Interdisciplinary
Teaching ACEE
Mathematics and Watersheds |
FCF chapter 7 |
Online forum |
|
11/12 |
Thematic
Units Project
Learning Tree |
SFAC chapters
5 & 9 |
Lesson plan
due |
|
11/19 |
Teaching and
Assessing Authentically |
FCF chapter 6 |
Online forum |
|
11/26 |
Professional
Development and Organizations |
FCF chapter 8 |
Bring science
teaching materials |
|
12/3 |
Mini-Lesson
Presentations |
|
Thematic
Unit due |
|
12/10 |
Mini-Lesson
Presentations |
|
Portfolio
due |
SFAC: Science for All Children; SFAA: Science for all
Americans; FCF Florida Curriculum Frameworks
Assignment
Descriptions and Rubrics
Concept
Map Assignment:
Your
concept map illustrates visually the topics that relate to a broad science
concept. The illustration shows details about the relationships among the
topics. Choose a main concept from the list here, and organize topics
below. Rank topics from general to more specific. Connect topics with
links that describe their relationship. Because your lesson plan will
require a concept map, it is recommended that you begin learning about
your lesson plan topic with this concept map assignment.
Elementary
science concepts:
Physical
Science:
Ø
Matter:
properties, measurement, states, chemical reactions, elements
Ø
Motion:
force, machines, gravity, speed, sound
Ø
Energy:
light, heat, electricity, magnetism, transfer of energy
Life
Science:
Ø
Characteristics
of organisms: classification, environments, structures, cells, disease
Ø
Life
cycles: heredity, reproduction, genetics, adaptations, evolution,
extinction
Ø
Environments:
food webs, resources, change, energy sources, populations
Earth
and Space Science:
Ø
Earth:
land, landforms, water, sky, change, geologic history, climate
Ø
Sky: solar
system, motion, gravity, solar energy, weather
Concept
Map Rubric: (5 points)
|
Value |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Concepts |
Incomplete,
illogical |
Complete,
logical |
Complete,
logical, appropriate connections |
|
Creativity |
Not evident |
Exhibited |
|
|
Presentation |
Errors of
spelling and language |
Largely free
of errors of spelling and language |
Easily read,
free of errors of language and spelling |
Lesson
Plan and Unit Plan Guide:
As a
member of a group, you will develop a unit of learning experiences
centered around a common theme. Each group member will be evaluated
on the unit as a whole and on the group’s presentation of an example
mini-lesson from the unit. You will choose one lesson from the unit
which you’ve had primary responsibility for writing, and you will be
evaluated on that lesson.
The unit
plan will include:
Ø
A rationale
for the theme
Ø
An overview
of the audience, scope and sequence of lessons
Ø
A concept
map
Ø
A visual
activity organizer map or chart
Ø
At least 6
lessons fully outlined and including handout sheets. At least one
lesson has special needs adaptations. At least two lessons integrate
content from nonscience subjects. At least three lessons have hands-on
activities. At least one lesson is based on concepts from a MOSH exhibit
or demonstration.
Ø
A range of
student assessment strategies, including at least one rubric
Ø
A list of
the contributions of each group member
Lesson
Plan Checklist:
Ø
Lesson
title
Ø
Purpose
paragraph describing lesson conceptual objectives, importance, rationale,
sequence, and intended learning outcomes
Ø
Connections
to Sunshine State Standards
Ø
Materials
needed by teacher and students
Ø
Safety and
management guidelines
Ø
Lesson
introduction specifying expected duration of events, important questions
for discussion, relation to prior knowledge and how knowledge in this
lesson will be developed in future lessons
Ø
Development
of lesson, including hook or invitation, description of events, the
teacher?s role and student activities, application of the learning cycle
Ø
Lesson
closure, detailing how lesson will conclude, and connections to other
content
Ø
Assessments
of learning, demonstrating how you will know that the intended learning
outcome has been achieved.
Unit
and Mini-Lesson Evaluation Rubric: (20 points)
|
Value |
0 Meets none of the criteria |
1 Meets few of the criteria |
2 Meets most of the criteria |
3 Meets almost all of the criteria |
4 Meets or exceeds all criteria |
|
Completeness, includes all elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theme represented across lessons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appropriate and varied activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appropriate and varied assessments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organized and effective presentation |
|
|
|
|
|
Lesson
Plan Evaluation Rubric: 15 Points
|
Value |
1 Meets few of the criteria |
2 Meets most of the criteria |
3 Meets or exceeds all criteria |
|
Complete, includes all elements |
|
|
|
|
Linked to appropriate standards |
|
|
|
|
Lesson provides challenging, relevant, and exciting
learning experiences |
|
|
|
|
Professionally written |
|
|
|
|
Effective and creative use of materials |
|
|
|
Before
you begin planning the lesson ask yourself:
Ø
Is the
lesson I have selected, student centered or teacher centered? If it is
teacher centered, how can I revise it to be more student centered?
Ø
What
learning goals do I want the students to accomplish as a result of
experiencing this lesson?
Ø
What
materials are needed to accomplish this lesson: ideally, practically?
Ø
How will I
hook students? What strategy will be my invitation to learn or motivation?
As
you plan think about the following:
Ø
How will
this lesson relate to students? every day experiences? How will this
lesson relate to what they already know and understand so that knowledge
construction will be facilitated?
Ø
How much
time is needed for students to complete the lesson, inquire, experiment,
and reflect?
Ø
What
choices will the children have in the materials they use or what they do
with them?
Ø
What kind
of data will be collected - do the children know how to collect data of
this sort or is a direct instruction mini-lesson needed before they can
begin?
Ø
Exactly
what can I say to the children to challenge them to be scientists and
explore the problem?
Ø
How will I
assist children to make sense of knowledge they have generated from their
experience?
Ø
What
questions can I ask to encourage children to think about what they have
done, how they have organized their data and how the data can be
interpreted?
Ø
What
questions can I ask to encourage children to analyze, synthesize and
critically reflect on what they have done and what they have learned?
Ø
How will I
assess whether the goals set for the lesson have been achieved by the
students?
Professional
Development Assignment
Following
a professional development activity in science written summary will be
turned in.
Professional
Development Note Format
Name
Date
of Activity
Title
of Activity:
Presenter
Name and Location
Start
and end time of professional development
Topic
or concept observed
Activities
and processes observed
State
Science standards addressed
Materials
used (technology, handouts, books, assessments, manipulatives, other)
Assessment
methods used
Management
techniques related to safety, adaptations for diverse learners,
interdisciplinary connections
Reflections
and other notes
Analysis
of instructional strategies and effectiveness of lesson for students
Interview/discussion
with at least two teachers about:
Professional
Development Evaluation Rubric: (15 points)
|
Header: school, teacher, lesson title, audience |
Lesson overview: concepts taught |
Analysis: strategies, management,
reflections |
Connections: standards, interdisciplinary |
Interviews: teachers and students |
Presentation: your written work |
|
2 All present |
3 Clear overview |
3 Very descriptive |
2 Connections listed, with others possible |
3 4 interviews summarized |
2 Organized, few errors |
|
1 Most present |
2 Somewhat clear |
2 Few descriptions |
1 Connections listed only |
2 Interview or description missing |
1 Organized, some errors |
|
0 Most absent |
1Vague overview |
1 Superficial mention |
0 Missing or absent |
1 Little summary, or few interviews summarized |
0Poor flow, many errors |
|
|
0 Confusing overview |
0Missing or absent |
|
0 Missing or absent |
|
Issue Paper
Assignment:
Your
issue paper will describe an issue in science education. Possible issues
may be:
Ø
Gender
differences in science interest and achievement
Ø
Authentic
assessment of science learning
Ø
Safety
concerns in science classrooms
Ø
Adaptation
of science lessons for diverse learners
Ø
Current and
future trends in elementary science education
Ø
Status of
standardized high-stakes tests for science
Ø
Review of
science education programs internationally
Ø
Features of
highly effective science teachers/programs
Ø
Altering
misconceptions in science
Ø
What is
science literacy?
Ø
The role of
concept maps in learning science
Ø
How science
standards impact science teaching
Ø
The value
of learning science outside the classroom
Ø
Effective
technology for learning science
In a
4-6 page double-spaced paper using 12-point font, define the issue you are
investigating. Discuss the importance of the issue to children,
teachers, parents, and society. Read reports from a variety of sources,
including a balance of print and electronic media. Make sense of the
different viewpoints on the issue and communicate them clearly. Use
the information you’ve read to make recommendations about how the issue
should be handled, including your own viewpoint. Use standard APA or MLA
style to list at least four references for the paper.
Issue
Paper Evaluation Rubric: (15 points)
|
Value |
Meets or exceeds all criteria 3 |
Meets most criteria 2 |
Meets few criteria 1 |
|
Professional appearance and structure |
|
|
|
|
Cohesive organization |
|
|
|
|
Important and clear issue |
|
|
|
|
Recommendations and viewpoint |
|
|
|
|
Appropriate references |
|
|
|
Portfolio Assignment:
Your
portfolio will be a systematic collection of evidence presented to
demonstrate what you have learned and how you learned it. At the end of
the course, decide what to include and what it means for you as a science
teacher. Some evidence will be responses to your experiences. The main
purpose of this portfolio is for you to show your evolving knowledge of
how you can guide successful student learning of science concepts. Using
the portfolio, you will show your emerging understanding of the
complexities of science teaching, and you will link theory to practice.
At
the completion of the course, your task will be to select items that show
your initial understanding of student science learning, and how your
understanding has grown. Evidence can include discussions, forum entries,
assignments, classroom observations, responses to readings, interviews,
your mini-lesson, and observations of children at play.
Types
of Evidence:
Artifacts
are documents produced as part of your normal course work, such as papers,
field notes, or recordings. Reproductions are documents about
course events, such as transcripts or tapes of discussions. Attestations
are documents about your course work written by someone else, such as
comments by the instructor, classmates, or forum participants. Document is
used loosely here, and can include notes, drafts, journals, drawings,
photos, recordings, and digital files.
The Importance of a
Teaching Portfolio
The
main reason to assemble a portfolio is for your personal growth and
development as a teacher. The evidence contained in the portfolio will
show you where your strengths are, and will reveal areas where your
teaching would benefit from more work. Another important purpose of a
portfolio is to demonstrate to others the kind of teacher you have become.
Your portfolio is the best voice you have in job interviews, certification
reviews, grant applications, and award nominations. Increasingly, states
and districts require portfolios for teacher evaluation. When working on
National Board certification, the portfolio is essential.
The
goal of the teaching portfolio is to develop continual, reflective
excellence as a guide for student learning. The purpose of your portfolio
is to illustrate who you are now as an educator, how you reached this
point, and who you want to be. The portfolio should be a reflection of
your current and emerging self as a professional teacher. It should
carefully and thoughtfully document a set of accomplishments attained
during the semester. Each entry should illustrate your accomplishments.
Entries
can include:
Ø
papers,
field notes, or recordings.
Ø
transcripts
or tapes of discussions.
Ø
comments by
the instructor, classmates, or forum participants.
Ø
notes,
drafts, journals, drawings, photos, recordings, and digital files.
Each
entry must be accompanied by a rationale that explains why the
material was chosen and why it serves as evidence of your skill. Each
entry must also include a reflection, a written statement about
each example that answers some of the following questions:
What
did you learn from this experience?
What
do you understand now that you did not understand before?
What
impact will this have on your teaching?
What
obstacles did you encounter and overcome?
How
did others respond?
Criteria for
Developing and Assessing a Professional Portfolio
Ø
Your name
and the title Portfolio must appear on the cover.
Ø
Written
documents must be word-processed.
Ø
Appropriate
grammar, spelling, and sentence structure must be used.
Ø
A Table of
Contents must be included.
Ø
A rationale
and reflection must accompany each entry.
Examples
of rationale:
Ø
This ___
was selected to represent ___ because ?
Ø
It is an
innovative approach.
Ø
It was
effective at accomplishing ___
Ø
It
demonstrated the instructional strategies of ___
Ø
It is a
real-world application of ___
Ø
It shows
why a science teacher should/should not ____
Examples
of reflection:
Ø
From this
experience, I learned ___ about students/education/teaching.
Ø
I now
understand more clearly ___.
Ø
Using this
approach has made me decide to ___ or change ____.
Ø
A challenge
facing me was ____.
Ø
The
students benefited because ____.
Ø My colleagues felt _____, and now they _____.
Resources for Elementary Science:
Activities:
Bosak,
S. 1991. Science Is? Ontario, Canada: The Communication
Project.
AIMS:
Activities Integrating Mathematics and Science. http://www.aimsed.org
888-733-2467.
GEMS:
Great Explorations in Math and Science. http://www.lhs.berkeley.edu/gems/GEMS.html
Journals:
Elementary
School Science Journal of Elementary Science Education, http://science.coe.uwf.edu/JESE/JESE.HTM
School
Science and Mathematics, School Science and Mathematics Association,
Department of Curriculum and Foundations, Bloomsburg University, 400
E. Second St., Bloomsburg, PA 17815-1301 (717) 389-4915
Science
and Children, NSTA, 1840 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22201-3000 (703)
243-7100 http://www.nsta.org
Science
Education Directory of Periodicals: http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/rtess/8.html
Professional
Organizations:
American
Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), publishers of Science
Education News and Science for All Americans. http://www.aaas.org
1333 H St., NW, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 326-6400
Florida
Association of Science Teachers (FAST)
National
Science Foundation, Directorate for Education and Human Resources,
http://www.nsf.org 4201 Wilson
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 306-1600
National
Science Teachers Association (NSTA), 1840 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA
22201-3000 (703) 243-7100 http://www.nsta.org
Directory
of Organizations and Resources: http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/rtess/10.html
Web:
Resources
for Teaching Elementary Science, National Academy Press, http://bob.nap.edu/readingroom/books/rtess
Also
at National Academy Press http://www.nap.edu
Science for All Children, Every Child a Scientist, National Science
Education Standards, How People Learn
Ask
ERIC Lesson Plans http://ericir.syr.edu/Virtual/Lessons
Ask
the Experts at Scientific American http://www.sciam.com/askexpert/index.html
Assessing
the Whole Child, CRESST http://www.cse.ucla.edu/CRESST/pages/products.htm
Beakman’s
World http://www.beakman.com
Eisenhower
National Clearinghouse, for K-12 math and science http://www.enc.org
ERIC
Clearinghouse for Science, Math, and Environmental Education, http://www.ericse.org/
Mad
Scientist Network http://www.madsci.org
NASA
Observatorium for Earth and Space http://www.observe.ivv.nasa.gov/nasa/core.shtml
NASA
Spacelink http://spacelink.nasa.gov/.index.html
Newton’s
Apple http://www.pbs.org/ktca/newtons
Science
Questions and Answers http://www.last-word.com
Science
Technology Daily Review http://SciTech.com
Science
Toys http://scitoys.com/net4kids.html
Sunshine
State Standards http://www.firn.edu/doe/menu/sss.htm
US
Geological Survey education site http://www.usgs.gov/education
Volcano
World http://volcano.und.nodak.edu
Weather
Classroom http://www.weather.com/education
Yucky
Page http://www.yucky.com
Portfolio Assessment Rubric
|
Criterion |
Excellent 4 |
Good 3 |
Fair 2 |
Poor 1 |
Unacceptable 0 |
|
1 Presentation |
Arranged attractively, typed, easy to read. Well organized
with table of contents. Includes rationale and reflection for
each item. High quality materials. Sections clearly marked |
Arranged well, typed, fairly easy to read. Some rationale
provided, most sections well-organized. Good quality materials.
Sections are clear |
Typed, easy to read in most places. Adequately organized.
Poor quality of materials. Rationale absent or unclear. |
Typed, not arranged well. Poorly organized. No
illustrations. Rationale for inclusion is absent. |
Not typed. Disorganized. Difficult to follow. |
|
2. Language |
Clear, correct language. Interesting and engaging writing
helps reader to understand details. Sufficient detail to guide
future decisions. |
Clear, correct language. Interesting writing clearly
conveys meaning. Some detail to guide future decisions. |
Overall clear correct language. Occasional minor errors.
Little details to guide future decisions. |
Consistent minor errors in structure. |
Major errors in language use. |
|
3. Contents |
All required contents. At least 3 distinct sections of
evidence. A variety of evidence is presented in each section.
Many additional materials enhance primary purpose. Includes
technology evidence. |
Al required contents. Some variety of evidence is presented
in each section. Some supplemental material related to primary
purpose is included. |
All required contents. Little to no variety of evidence
included. No supplemental material, or purpose not made clear. |
Missing some required contents. No variety of evidence. |
Missing or incomplete contents. |
|
4. Reflective statement |
Evidence that the student has sought connections between
theory and practice for different sections. Evidence of
analysis, synthesis and evaluation |
Evidence that some connections between theory and practice
has been made. Elements of analysis, synthesis, or evaluation
used in most of the reflection. Creativity and self-reflection
generally present. |
Summaries of what has been previously stated. Little
evidence of theory application is present. Self-reflection is
not supported by the evidence. |
Restatement of what has been stated before. No evidence of
theory application. Has the ?put together the night before?
look. |
Section is missing. |
|
5. Standards and integration |
Evidence that clear connections to state standards, Goal 3
standards, benchmarks, and Habits of Mind has been made. |
Evidence that some connection to state and national
standards have been made. |
Awareness of state and national standards, connections not
clearly communicated. |
Acknowledgement of state or national standards. Connections
are absent. |
Absent from portfolio. |
Last updated
03/13/04