|
Dance Card Rankings for 2010
(FINAL)
|
At right are rankings of all NCAA Division I men's basketball teams through
the games of Sunday, March 14, 2010 (i.e., all regular season and conference tournament games)
according to the newly updated "Dance
Card" formula developed by Jay
Coleman of the University of North Florida, Mike DuMond
of Charles River Associates, and Allen
Lynch of Mercer University. The Dance Card is a formula designed to
predict which teams will receive at-large tournament bids from the NCAA
Tournament Selection Committee.
The Dance Card correctly predicted 33 of the 34
at-large selections (missing only on Florida), for a 2010 accuracy
of 97%. This represented the best year ever for the Dance
Card, as Florida was the first team
predicted out, and Mississippi
State was the last
team predicted in. Thus, the
predictions were as accurate as possible when missing just one at-large slot.
The original version of the Dance Card (based on 1994
through 1999 data and developed by Coleman and Lynch) was published in Interfaces (a journal
of the Institute for Operations
Research and the Management Sciences) in 2001, and was the version
used to make at-large predictions through the 2008 Tournament. An article
discussing research associated with a newly updated and modified version
of the Dance Card (based on 1999 through 2008 data) is forthcoming in Managerial
and Decision Economics. The predictions for last year's (2009)
Tournament, as well as the rankings shown at right, are based on the
updated Dance Card.
Also shown at right is the probability that a team with the same profile
would have gotten an at-large bid in past years, if today was
Selection Sunday and all regular season and conference tournament games
had been completed. Because the quality of teams near the bubble line
vary from year to year, a team with a relatively low chance of getting a
bid in past years may actually be ranked above the current bubble line.
When there are teams with less than a 50% historical chance of getting a
bid actually ranked above the bubble line, it's an indication of a
relatively weak field of at-large candidates for the final slots.
(The RPI figures at right
reflect the old RPI formula, in which wins on the road and losses
at home are weighted equally. This is the version of the RPI on
which both versions of the Dance Card were developed, and the version
used to generate the predictions in all past years.)
Dance Card rankings for other
seasons can be found by clicking on the appropriate link below:
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
|
|
Accuracy and Performance of the Dance Card
|
|
The original Dance Card has
missed on more than three spots in only two seasons (2007 and
2008). Over the 15 year period from 1994 through 2008, the original
Dance Card correctly predicted 476 of the 512 available at-large
Tournament slots (or 93%). Over the 9-year period (2000
through 2008) for which the original Dance Card was used since its initial
development in 1999, it correctly predicted 284 out of the 307
available at-large Tournament slots (92.5%). The formula's best
years were in 2001 and in 2005, when it correctly predicted 33 of the
34 available at-large Tournament slots (or 97% accuracy).
The
newly updated and modified Dance Card correctly predicted 32 of the 34 available at-large
slots in 2009, the first season in which it was used to make predictions.
Over the 10 years of data (1999 through 2008) on which its development
was based, the version currently being used to obtain the rankings at
right would have correctly predicted 329
of the 341 available at-large Tournament slots, or 96.5% accuracy (i.e., it would
have averaged just over one at-large slot missed per year).
The Dance Card can
only be as accurate as the Selection Committees are consistent;
it is an estimate of the Selection Committees' (not the authors')
decision criteria. The high level of accuracy and consistency of
the model is strong evidence that the Selection Committees (which differ
in composition each year) are actually quite consistent from year to
year.
|
|
|
General Description of the Dance
Card
|
The
Dance Card is a formula derived by Coleman, DuMond,
and Lynch as an estimate of the decision rule that the NCAA Tournament
Selection Committee uses when picking the teams that will get at-large
bids to the NCAA men's basketball tournament. Using past decisions
of the NCAA Tournament Selection Committee and numerous pieces of information
(e.g. RPI rankings, number of wins and losses, conference records, etc.)
for all teams that were candidates for at-large selections in those
years, the authors devised the Dance Card formula as an estimate of which
pieces of information were most important to the Selection Committee, and
the weights that the Committee placed on those pieces of
information.
The Dance Card has
been featured in articles by the Wall
Street Journal, Forbes,
Investor's Business Daily, USA
Today, the New
York Times, CNN Headline News, UPI, and the Associated Press,
two stories from which were picked up by a large number of newspapers and
news Web sites, including the Washington
Post, the Boston Globe, the Miami Herald, and the San Francisco Chronicle.
The research has also been widely featured in the business intelligence
and customer relationship management media, including stories in CIO
magazine, the Business
Intelligence Journal, eWeek, Information
Week, Database Trends &
Applications, the Business Intelligence Network, SearchCRM.com,
DestinationCRM.com,
BI-BestPractices.com,
KDnuggets.com, DSstar, and DM Review.
It was also the subject of invited lectures at M2004
and M2005,
the world's largest data mining conference, as well as numerous
television and radio interviews.
|
Data Sources
|
|
In order to build the original Dance Card formula,
Coleman and Lynch used data, including estimates of the RPI for each
team, from CollegeRPI.com,
the web site of Jerry Palm of Palm Sports Resources, Inc. The
authors are extremely grateful to Mr. Palm for his work to
provide this information.
In order to build the data
on which the updated Dance Card and its rankings were developed, the
authors used game scores from Ken Pomeroy. The authors are very
thankful to Mr. Pomeroy for his generous and invaluable service.
Special thanks also go to Kenneth Massey for including the
Dance Card rankings on his basketball ranking compilation page.
|
Dance Card Authors
|
|
Jay Coleman is the Richard deR. Kip
Professor of Operations Management & Quantitative Methods in
the Coggin College
of Business at the University of North Florida. Allen Lynch is Associate
Professor of Economics & Quantitative Methods at the Stetson
School of Business and Economics at Mercer University.
Mike DuMond
is a principal with Charles River Associates in Tallahassee, Florida.
|
Special Thanks to
SAS!!
|
|
The
authors would like to give a hearty and special thanks to all
the good people at SAS Institute Inc., the maker of the
software package used to develop the Dance Card. In
particular, we thank Mike Nemecek, Faye
Merrideth, Anne Milley,
and Trent Smith, each of whom have been an absolute delight to
work with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please forward all comments to jcoleman@unf.edu
Jay
Coleman's Home Page
This page last updated on March 14, 2010 at 7:02
p.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dance
|
Chance
|
RPI
|
|
Rank
|
Team (@=automatic bid)
|
Card
|
of Bid
|
Rank
|
|
1
|
@Kansas
|
19.0037
|
100.0%
|
1
|
|
2
|
@Kentucky
|
14.2242
|
100.0%
|
2
|
|
3
|
@West Virginia
|
13.8631
|
100.0%
|
3
|
|
4
|
Syracuse
|
13.3986
|
100.0%
|
4
|
|
5
|
@Duke
|
12.8198
|
100.0%
|
5
|
|
6
|
Kansas St.
|
12.4990
|
100.0%
|
6
|
|
7
|
Georgetown
|
10.7451
|
100.0%
|
7
|
|
8
|
Purdue
|
10.2660
|
100.0%
|
12
|
|
9
|
@Temple
|
10.2527
|
100.0%
|
9
|
|
10
|
Baylor
|
10.0821
|
100.0%
|
8
|
|
11
|
@Ohio St.
|
9.3647
|
100.0%
|
22
|
|
12
|
Villanova
|
8.9108
|
100.0%
|
15
|
|
13
|
New Mexico
|
8.5144
|
100.0%
|
10
|
|
14
|
Texas A&M
|
7.7031
|
100.0%
|
14
|
|
15
|
Pittsburgh
|
7.1389
|
100.0%
|
11
|
|
16
|
Tennessee
|
6.9381
|
100.0%
|
16
|
|
17
|
Maryland
|
6.7815
|
100.0%
|
17
|
|
18
|
@Butler
|
6.6778
|
100.0%
|
13
|
|
19
|
Wisconsin
|
6.4625
|
100.0%
|
20
|
|
20
|
Texas
|
6.2976
|
100.0%
|
29
|
|
21
|
Xavier
|
6.2276
|
100.0%
|
23
|
|
22
|
Vanderbilt
|
6.1837
|
100.0%
|
18
|
|
23
|
Richmond
|
5.9623
|
100.0%
|
25
|
|
24
|
California
|
5.9603
|
100.0%
|
21
|
|
25
|
Brigham Young
|
5.0724
|
100.0%
|
24
|
|
26
|
Texas El Paso
|
5.0704
|
100.0%
|
33
|
|
27
|
Michigan St.
|
4.9674
|
100.0%
|
26
|
|
28
|
Oklahoma St.
|
4.7792
|
100.0%
|
30
|
|
29
|
@Northern Iowa
|
4.7674
|
100.0%
|
19
|
|
30
|
@Washington
|
4.5972
|
100.0%
|
38
|
|
31
|
Gonzaga
|
4.4810
|
100.0%
|
37
|
|
32
|
@San Diego St.
|
3.6837
|
100.0%
|
28
|
|
33
|
@Old Dominion
|
3.5473
|
100.0%
|
36
|
|
34
|
Marquette
|
3.5070
|
100.0%
|
45
|
|
35
|
Missouri
|
3.3061
|
100.0%
|
44
|
|
36
|
Notre Dame
|
3.2053
|
99.9%
|
39
|
|
37
|
Utah St.
|
3.1504
|
99.9%
|
35
|
|
38
|
Clemson
|
2.9379
|
99.8%
|
31
|
|
39
|
Louisville
|
2.5124
|
99.4%
|
27
|
|
40
|
Georgia Tech
|
2.4426
|
99.3%
|
34
|
|
41
|
@St. Mary's
|
2.0591
|
98.0%
|
32
|
|
42
|
Nevada Las Vegas
|
1.9810
|
97.6%
|
42
|
|
43
|
Florida St.
|
1.9058
|
97.2%
|
41
|
|
44
|
@Siena
|
1.4825
|
93.1%
|
40
|
|
45
|
Minnesota
|
1.0648
|
85.7%
|
57
|
|
46
|
Wake Forest
|
0.9271
|
82.3%
|
43
|
|
47
|
Mississippi St. (miss)
|
0.8915
|
81.4%
|
59
|
|
The Bubble Bursts Here
|
|
|
48
|
Florida (miss)
|
0.8504
|
80.2%
|
49
|
|
49
|
Arizona St.
|
0.8335
|
79.8%
|
56
|
|
50
|
@Murray St.
|
0.0027
|
50.1%
|
71
|
|
51
|
Mississippi
|
-0.4167
|
33.8%
|
55
|
|
52
|
Illinois
|
-0.7959
|
21.3%
|
64
|
|
53
|
Virginia Tech
|
-0.8709
|
19.2%
|
63
|
|
54
|
Memphis
|
-0.9276
|
17.7%
|
48
|
|
55
|
UAB
|
-1.5235
|
6.4%
|
47
|
|
56
|
Rhode Island
|
-1.6168
|
5.3%
|
46
|
|
57
|
@Wofford
|
-1.7067
|
4.4%
|
81
|
|
58
|
Kent St.
|
-1.9316
|
2.7%
|
52
|
|
59
|
Seton Hall
|
-2.0625
|
2.0%
|
54
|
|
60
|
@New Mexico St.
|
-2.2655
|
1.2%
|
61
|
|
61
|
@Cornell
|
-2.2998
|
1.1%
|
58
|
|
62
|
South Florida
|
-2.3991
|
0.8%
|
66
|
|
63
|
William & Mary
|
-2.4721
|
0.7%
|
68
|
|
64
|
Dayton
|
-2.5651
|
0.5%
|
51
|
|
65
|
Wichita St.
|
-2.5937
|
0.5%
|
53
|
|
66
|
Northeastern
|
-2.9457
|
0.2%
|
75
|
|
67
|
@Oakland
|
-2.9522
|
0.2%
|
69
|
|
68
|
Virginia Commonwealth
|
-3.1456
|
0.1%
|
72
|
|
69
|
Arizona
|
-3.3840
|
0.0%
|
84
|
|
70
|
Tulsa
|
-3.8963
|
0.0%
|
65
|
|
71
|
Cincinnati
|
-4.2563
|
0.0%
|
60
|
|
72
|
Charlotte
|
-4.3673
|
0.0%
|
78
|
|
73
|
Marshall
|
-4.4289
|
0.0%
|
67
|
|
74
|
Portland
|
-4.5016
|
0.0%
|
80
|
|
75
|
St. Louis
|
-4.5391
|
0.0%
|
77
|
|
76
|
Southern
California
|
-4.8613
|
0.0%
|
104
|
|
77
|
Akron
|
-5.4860
|
0.0%
|
83
|
|
78
|
@Sam Houston St.
|
-5.5265
|
0.0%
|
85
|
|
79
|
Weber St.
|
-5.5643
|
0.0%
|
97
|
|
80
|
Nevada
|
-5.6609
|
0.0%
|
73
|
|
81
|
@Houston
|
-5.9624
|
0.0%
|
110
|
|
82
|
Louisiana Tech
|
-6.2788
|
0.0%
|
89
|
|
83
|
Connecticut
|
-6.6558
|
0.0%
|
50
|
|
84
|
Morehead St.
|
-6.7144
|
0.0%
|
91
|
|
85
|
IUPUI
|
-6.8207
|
0.0%
|
96
|
|
86
|
Illinois St.
|
-6.9249
|
0.0%
|
76
|
|
87
|
Wright St.
|
-7.0821
|
0.0%
|
99
|
|
88
|
Iona
|
-7.2267
|
0.0%
|
88
|
|
89
|
Fairfield
|
-7.2544
|
0.0%
|
94
|
|
90
|
North Carolina St.
|
-7.4205
|
0.0%
|
86
|
|
91
|
@UC Santa Barbara
|
-7.5587
|
0.0%
|
109
|
|
92
|
@Montana
|
-7.8018
|
0.0%
|
108
|
|
93
|
South Carolina
|
-8.4264
|
0.0%
|
79
|
|
94
|
Alabama
|
-8.4539
|
0.0%
|
82
|
|
95
|
@Ohio
|
-8.8354
|
0.0%
|
95
|
|
96
|
College of Charleston
|
-8.9993
|
0.0%
|
107
|
|
97
|
St. John's
|
-9.0877
|
0.0%
|
70
|
|
98
|
Pacific
|
-9.2351
|
0.0%
|
130
|
|
99
|
Northern
Colorado
|
-9.2972
|
0.0%
|
131
|
|
100
|
UCLA
|
-9.4528
|
0.0%
|
113
|
|
101
|
@North Texas
|
-9.4852
|
0.0%
|
122
|
|
102
|
Appalachian St.
|
-9.5350
|
0.0%
|
117
|
|
103
|
Wisconsin Green Bay
|
-9.6221
|
0.0%
|
114
|
|
104
|
Texas Tech
|
-9.7003
|
0.0%
|
62
|
|
105
|
@Morgan St.
|
-9.8504
|
0.0%
|
126
|
|
106
|
Southern
Mississippi
|
-9.9097
|
0.0%
|
128
|
|
107
|
Northwestern
|
-10.1001
|
0.0%
|
105
|
|
108
|
Bradley
|
-10.4929
|
0.0%
|
98
|
|
109
|
Coastal Carolina
|
-10.6960
|
0.0%
|
132
|
|
110
|
Western Kentucky
|
-10.7383
|
0.0%
|
129
|
|
111
|
Harvard
|
-10.8477
|
0.0%
|
115
|
|
112
|
Miami FL
|
-11.0465
|
0.0%
|
90
|
|
113
|
North Carolina
|
-11.1872
|
0.0%
|
74
|
|
114
|
Oregon
|
-11.3996
|
0.0%
|
112
|
|
115
|
Troy
|
-11.6688
|
0.0%
|
133
|
|
116
|
Missouri St.
|
-11.7556
|
0.0%
|
92
|
|
117
|
Hofstra
|
-11.7948
|
0.0%
|
136
|
|
118
|
Oral Roberts
|
-11.8456
|
0.0%
|
144
|
|
119
|
Michigan
|
-11.8544
|
0.0%
|
118
|
|
120
|
Georgia
|
-11.9904
|
0.0%
|
87
|
|
121
|
Colorado
|
-12.1451
|
0.0%
|
102
|
|
122
|
Indiana St.
|
-12.3016
|
0.0%
|
93
|
|
123
|
@Vermont
|
-12.3362
|
0.0%
|
141
|
|
124
|
Wisconsin Milwaukee
|
-12.3783
|
0.0%
|
146
|
|
125
|
Buffalo
|
-12.5586
|
0.0%
|
123
|
|
126
|
Niagara
|
-12.8854
|
0.0%
|
143
|
|
127
|
George Mason
|
-12.9048
|
0.0%
|
150
|
|
128
|
Boston College
|
-12.9084
|
0.0%
|
103
|
|
129
|
Western Carolina
|
-13.0107
|
0.0%
|
138
|
|
130
|
@East Tennessee St.
|
-13.1418
|
0.0%
|
137
|
|
131
|
Iowa St.
|
-13.1654
|
0.0%
|
100
|
|
132
|
Creighton
|
-13.2143
|
0.0%
|
111
|
|
133
|
Long Beach St.
|
-13.4680
|
0.0%
|
134
|
|
134
|
Belmont
|
-13.5393
|
0.0%
|
154
|
|
135
|
Utah
|
-13.5985
|
0.0%
|
135
|
|
136
|
@Robert Morris
|
-13.7218
|
0.0%
|
142
|
|
137
|
Princeton
|
-13.9503
|
0.0%
|
148
|
|
138
|
Stanford
|
-14.0335
|
0.0%
|
140
|
|
139
|
Virginia
|
-14.0595
|
0.0%
|
106
|
|
140
|
Colorado St.
|
-14.0997
|
0.0%
|
121
|
|
141
|
Arkansas
|
-14.1770
|
0.0%
|
120
|
|
142
|
Loyola Marymount
|
-14.2000
|
0.0%
|
177
|
|
143
|
Seattle
|
-14.2381
|
0.0%
|
199
|
|
144
|
Jacksonville
|
-14.3504
|
0.0%
|
169
|
|
145
|
Detroit
|
-14.3512
|
0.0%
|
164
|
|
146
|
Boston University
|
-14.5651
|
0.0%
|
149
|
|
147
|
Duquesne
|
-14.6383
|
0.0%
|
116
|
|
148
|
Oklahoma
|
-14.8816
|
0.0%
|
101
|
|
149
|
Western Michigan
|
-14.8854
|
0.0%
|
147
|
|
150
|
Cleveland St.
|
-15.0340
|
0.0%
|
145
|
|
151
|
Miami OH
|
-15.0624
|
0.0%
|
139
|
|
152
|
Drexel
|
-15.1008
|
0.0%
|
156
|
|
153
|
Oregon St.
|
-15.2858
|
0.0%
|
172
|
|
154
|
Stony Brook
|
-15.3720
|
0.0%
|
167
|
|
155
|
Stephen F. Austin
|
-15.4311
|
0.0%
|
157
|
|
156
|
St. Bonaventure
|
-15.6596
|
0.0%
|
152
|
|
157
|
Quinnipiac
|
-15.8960
|
0.0%
|
168
|
|
158
|
Rider
|
-15.9687
|
0.0%
|
153
|
|
159
|
Auburn
|
-16.2160
|
0.0%
|
127
|
|
160
|
Middle Tennessee
|
-16.4178
|
0.0%
|
180
|
|
161
|
Davidson
|
-16.8036
|
0.0%
|
170
|
|
162
|
@Lehigh
|
-16.9773
|
0.0%
|
159
|
|
163
|
Washington St.
|
-17.0090
|
0.0%
|
155
|
|
164
|
Eastern Kentucky
|
-17.0875
|
0.0%
|
160
|
|
165
|
Campbell
|
-17.2435
|
0.0%
|
187
|
|
166
|
George Washington
|
-17.3179
|
0.0%
|
151
|
|
167
|
St. Peter's
|
-17.7219
|
0.0%
|
182
|
|
168
|
Austin Peay
|
-17.7964
|
0.0%
|
162
|
|
169
|
Eastern Illinois
|
-18.3923
|
0.0%
|
171
|
|
170
|
Denver
|
-18.5889
|
0.0%
|
165
|
|
171
|
Montana St.
|
-18.9300
|
0.0%
|
209
|
|
172
|
Radford
|
-19.3171
|
0.0%
|
175
|
|
173
|
Lipscomb
|
-19.5301
|
0.0%
|
212
|
|
174
|
@Winthrop
|
-19.5413
|
0.0%
|
185
|
|
175
|
Nebraska
|
-19.5465
|
0.0%
|
119
|
|
176
|
Maine
|
-19.5623
|
0.0%
|
173
|
|
177
|
The Citadel
|
-19.7989
|
0.0%
|
198
|
|
178
|
Fresno St.
|
-19.8343
|
0.0%
|
176
|
|
179
|
Valparaiso
|
-20.0010
|
0.0%
|
196
|
|
180
|
Rutgers
|
-20.2921
|
0.0%
|
125
|
|
181
|
South Dakota
|
-20.3229
|
0.0%
|
227
|
|
182
|
Cal St. Fullerton
|
-20.4743
|
0.0%
|
210
|
|
183
|
Southern Methodist
|
-20.4745
|
0.0%
|
191
|
|
184
|
Central Florida
|
-20.5751
|
0.0%
|
183
|
|
185
|
San Francisco
|
-20.6126
|
0.0%
|
201
|
|
186
|
Texas A&M Corpus Chris
|
-20.6839
|
0.0%
|
190
|
|
187
|
Arkansas St.
|
-20.7082
|
0.0%
|
202
|
|
188
|
Providence
|
-20.9550
|
0.0%
|
124
|
|
189
|
Eastern Michigan
|
-21.0039
|
0.0%
|
205
|
|
190
|
Drake
|
-21.1937
|
0.0%
|
161
|
|
191
|
Jackson St.
|
-21.2072
|
0.0%
|
214
|
|
192
|
Texas San Antonio
|
-21.3405
|
0.0%
|
195
|
|
193
|
Idaho
|
-21.6176
|
0.0%
|
181
|
|
194
|
Central Michigan
|
-21.7402
|
0.0%
|
206
|
|
195
|
@Arkansas Pine Bluff
|
-21.8928
|
0.0%
|
208
|
|
196
|
Mount St. Mary's
|
-22.0705
|
0.0%
|
188
|
|
197
|
San Jose St.
|
-22.4551
|
0.0%
|
179
|
|
198
|
Massachusetts
|
-22.4689
|
0.0%
|
174
|
|
199
|
Southern
Illinois
|
-22.4779
|
0.0%
|
158
|
|
200
|
Northern Arizona
|
-22.5835
|
0.0%
|
219
|
|
201
|
Ball St.
|
-22.7633
|
0.0%
|
203
|
|
202
|
Southeastern
Louisiana
|
-22.8636
|
0.0%
|
204
|
|
203
|
Canisius
|
-22.8752
|
0.0%
|
213
|
|
204
|
La Salle
|
-23.1982
|
0.0%
|
163
|
|
205
|
Texas Christian
|
-23.4831
|
0.0%
|
178
|
|
206
|
Mercer
|
-24.2634
|
0.0%
|
221
|
|
207
|
South Dakota St.
|
-24.3085
|
0.0%
|
235
|
|
208
|
Saint Joseph's
|
-24.3929
|
0.0%
|
166
|
|
209
|
IUPU Fort Wayne
|
-24.4129
|
0.0%
|
231
|
|
210
|
Portland St.
|
-24.4325
|
0.0%
|
230
|
|
211
|
Florida Atlantic
|
-24.4840
|
0.0%
|
224
|
|
212
|
South Alabama
|
-24.4870
|
0.0%
|
211
|
|
213
|
Boise St.
|
-24.6009
|
0.0%
|
197
|
|
214
|
Delaware St.
|
-24.7112
|
0.0%
|
218
|
|
215
|
Lafayette
|
-24.8472
|
0.0%
|
217
|
|
216
|
UC Davis
|
-24.9476
|
0.0%
|
250
|
|
217
|
Bowling Green
|
-25.1712
|
0.0%
|
193
|
|
218
|
Longwood
|
-25.6325
|
0.0%
|
296
|
|
219
|
Tennessee Tech
|
-25.7290
|
0.0%
|
207
|
|
220
|
Winston Salem St.
|
-25.8422
|
0.0%
|
299
|
|
221
|
NC Asheville
|
-25.8693
|
0.0%
|
216
|
|
222
|
South Carolina St.
|
-26.1351
|
0.0%
|
242
|
|
223
|
Savannah St.
|
-26.6103
|
0.0%
|
318
|
|
224
|
Cal St. Bakersfield
|
-26.6668
|
0.0%
|
317
|
|
225
|
Penn St.
|
-26.9820
|
0.0%
|
184
|
|
226
|
Liberty
|
-26.9829
|
0.0%
|
241
|
|
227
|
Louisiana Lafayette
|
-26.9831
|
0.0%
|
248
|
|
228
|
Texas Southern
|
-27.3573
|
0.0%
|
243
|
|
229
|
Indiana
|
-27.6622
|
0.0%
|
194
|
|
230
|
Binghamton
|
-27.8547
|
0.0%
|
232
|
|
231
|
San Diego
|
-28.0561
|
0.0%
|
226
|
|
232
|
Texas Arlington
|
-28.0628
|
0.0%
|
233
|
|
233
|
Iowa
|
-28.1586
|
0.0%
|
186
|
|
234
|
Texas St.
|
-28.3252
|
0.0%
|
251
|
|
235
|
Bucknell
|
-28.3443
|
0.0%
|
258
|
|
236
|
Cal Poly
|
-28.6794
|
0.0%
|
259
|
|
237
|
Long Island
|
-29.3335
|
0.0%
|
249
|
|
238
|
Loyola MD
|
-29.4458
|
0.0%
|
223
|
|
239
|
Cal St. Northridge
|
-29.9379
|
0.0%
|
246
|
|
240
|
Chattanooga
|
-30.2606
|
0.0%
|
229
|
|
241
|
Hampton
|
-30.4190
|
0.0%
|
291
|
|
242
|
North Carolina Central
|
-30.6068
|
0.0%
|
345
|
|
243
|
Loyola Chicago
|
-30.6259
|
0.0%
|
220
|
|
244
|
Louisiana St.
|
-30.7051
|
0.0%
|
189
|
|
245
|
Yale
|
-30.8082
|
0.0%
|
268
|
|
246
|
High Point
|
-30.9317
|
0.0%
|
270
|
|
247
|
North Dakota St.
|
-31.0601
|
0.0%
|
272
|
|
248
|
Wyoming
|
-31.1386
|
0.0%
|
200
|
|
249
|
North Florida
|
-31.5184
|
0.0%
|
247
|
|
250
|
Santa Clara
|
-31.5985
|
0.0%
|
234
|
|
251
|
East Carolina
|
-31.7281
|
0.0%
|
239
|
|
252
|
Navy
|
-31.7580
|
0.0%
|
257
|
|
253
|
UC Riverside
|
-31.8948
|
0.0%
|
255
|
|
254
|
Bethune Cookman
|
-31.9817
|
0.0%
|
265
|
|
255
|
Towson
|
-32.0064
|
0.0%
|
254
|
|
256
|
Alabama St.
|
-32.0214
|
0.0%
|
298
|
|
257
|
Norfolk St.
|
-32.0292
|
0.0%
|
280
|
|
258
|
NC Greensboro
|
-32.0506
|
0.0%
|
245
|
|
259
|
New Hampshire
|
-32.0877
|
0.0%
|
244
|
|
260
|
Northern
Illinois
|
-32.3241
|
0.0%
|
256
|
|
261
|
Georgia St.
|
-32.3443
|
0.0%
|
238
|
|
262
|
NC Wilmington
|
-32.3697
|
0.0%
|
240
|
|
263
|
Hawaii
|
-32.5078
|
0.0%
|
215
|
|
264
|
UC Irvine
|
-32.5723
|
0.0%
|
267
|
|
265
|
Prairie View A&M
|
-32.8305
|
0.0%
|
293
|
|
266
|
Furman
|
-32.8355
|
0.0%
|
279
|
|
267
|
Columbia
|
-32.9089
|
0.0%
|
253
|
|
268
|
Fairleigh Dickinson
|
-33.0285
|
0.0%
|
269
|
|
269
|
Brown
|
-33.1014
|
0.0%
|
263
|
|
270
|
James Madison
|
-33.1259
|
0.0%
|
237
|
|
271
|
Manhattan
|
-33.3560
|
0.0%
|
225
|
|
272
|
DePaul
|
-33.5392
|
0.0%
|
192
|
|
273
|
American
|
-34.0941
|
0.0%
|
294
|
|
274
|
Houston Baptist
|
-34.1403
|
0.0%
|
327
|
|
275
|
Eastern
Washington
|
-34.3289
|
0.0%
|
273
|
|
276
|
Sacred Heart
|
-34.8396
|
0.0%
|
266
|
|
277
|
Nicholls St.
|
-35.1915
|
0.0%
|
276
|
|
278
|
Army
|
-35.2838
|
0.0%
|
252
|
|
279
|
Jacksonville St.
|
-35.3855
|
0.0%
|
282
|
|
280
|
Holy Cross
|
-35.3919
|
0.0%
|
281
|
|
281
|
Maryland Eastern
Shore
|
-35.4865
|
0.0%
|
308
|
|
282
|
Air Force
|
-35.5014
|
0.0%
|
222
|
|
283
|
St. Francis PA
|
-35.5089
|
0.0%
|
278
|
|
284
|
Tennessee St.
|
-35.5112
|
0.0%
|
261
|
|
285
|
Tulane
|
-35.5899
|
0.0%
|
260
|
|
286
|
Louisiana Monroe
|
-35.9007
|
0.0%
|
274
|
|
287
|
Samford
|
-35.9161
|
0.0%
|
264
|
|
288
|
Colgate
|
-35.9825
|
0.0%
|
285
|
|
289
|
Monmouth
|
-36.5571
|
0.0%
|
287
|
|
290
|
Kennesaw St.
|
-36.6755
|
0.0%
|
286
|
|
291
|
St. Francis NY
|
-36.7903
|
0.0%
|
300
|
|
292
|
Evansville
|
-36.8607
|
0.0%
|
236
|
|
293
|
Western Illinois
|
-36.9364
|
0.0%
|
288
|
|
294
|
Pepperdine
|
-36.9544
|
0.0%
|
292
|
|
295
|
Delaware
|
-37.1093
|
0.0%
|
228
|
|
296
|
Central
Connecticut
|
-37.1393
|
0.0%
|
310
|
|
297
|
Pennsylvania
|
-37.5955
|
0.0%
|
304
|
|
298
|
Elon
|
-37.6616
|
0.0%
|
283
|
|
299
|
Georgia Southern
|
-37.6925
|
0.0%
|
275
|
|
300
|
Missouri Kansas City
|
-37.7714
|
0.0%
|
289
|
|
301
|
Charleston Southern
|
-38.0714
|
0.0%
|
290
|
|
302
|
Lamar
|
-38.2755
|
0.0%
|
271
|
|
303
|
Idaho St.
|
-38.4816
|
0.0%
|
301
|
|
304
|
Hartford
|
-39.0012
|
0.0%
|
303
|
|
305
|
North Carolina A&T
|
-39.7119
|
0.0%
|
309
|
|
306
|
Sacramento St.
|
-40.0770
|
0.0%
|
306
|
|
307
|
Alabama A&M
|
-40.6880
|
0.0%
|
333
|
|
308
|
SIU Edwardsville
|
-40.8662
|
0.0%
|
328
|
|
309
|
Utah Valley
|
-40.9776
|
0.0%
|
339
|
|
310
|
Illinois Chicago
|
-41.0092
|
0.0%
|
277
|
|
311
|
Mississippi Valley St.
|
-41.0685
|
0.0%
|
329
|
|
312
|
Youngstown St.
|
-41.3600
|
0.0%
|
262
|
|
313
|
North Dakota
|
-41.3951
|
0.0%
|
340
|
|
314
|
Northwestern St.
|
-41.4796
|
0.0%
|
316
|
|
315
|
McNeese St.
|
-41.6516
|
0.0%
|
319
|
|
316
|
South Carolina Upstate
|
-41.9527
|
0.0%
|
311
|
|
317
|
Texas Pan American
|
-42.2307
|
0.0%
|
335
|
|
318
|
Arkansas Little Rock
|
-43.2435
|
0.0%
|
284
|
|
319
|
Rice
|
-43.3104
|
0.0%
|
295
|
|
320
|
NJ Inst of Technology
|
-43.5029
|
0.0%
|
342
|
|
321
|
Howard
|
-43.5485
|
0.0%
|
331
|
|
322
|
Gardner Webb
|
-43.9401
|
0.0%
|
323
|
|
323
|
Southeast Missouri St.
|
-43.9783
|
0.0%
|
312
|
|
324
|
Virginia Military Inst
|
-43.9944
|
0.0%
|
307
|
|
325
|
Florida A&M
|
-44.2736
|
0.0%
|
322
|
|
326
|
Florida International
|
-44.7084
|
0.0%
|
302
|
|
327
|
Florida Gulf Coast
|
-44.7201
|
0.0%
|
320
|
|
328
|
Chicago St.
|
-45.1677
|
0.0%
|
346
|
|
329
|
Centenary
|
-45.7343
|
0.0%
|
313
|
|
330
|
Central Arkansas
|
-45.9428
|
0.0%
|
324
|
|
331
|
Stetson
|
-46.3822
|
0.0%
|
326
|
|
332
|
Fordham
|
-46.7799
|
0.0%
|
297
|
|
333
|
Southern Utah
|
-46.7855
|
0.0%
|
315
|
|
334
|
Albany
|
-46.8837
|
0.0%
|
305
|
|
335
|
MD Baltimore County
|
-47.2901
|
0.0%
|
336
|
|
336
|
New Orleans
|
-47.8260
|
0.0%
|
321
|
|
337
|
Dartmouth
|
-48.0181
|
0.0%
|
325
|
|
338
|
Grambling
|
-48.6436
|
0.0%
|
341
|
|
339
|
Toledo
|
-48.7982
|
0.0%
|
314
|
|
340
|
Coppin St.
|
-50.1818
|
0.0%
|
338
|
|
341
|
Wagner
|
-50.4802
|
0.0%
|
334
|
|
342
|
Presbyterian
|
-51.5072
|
0.0%
|
330
|
|
343
|
Southern
|
-51.6070
|
0.0%
|
343
|
|
344
|
Tennessee Martin
|
-51.8429
|
0.0%
|
337
|
|
345
|
Marist
|
-52.0003
|
0.0%
|
332
|
|
346
|
Alcorn St.
|
-54.7168
|
0.0%
|
344
|
|
347
|
Bryant
|
-56.2365
|
0.0%
|
347
|
|
