Lone Star 2000: Integrating Preparation and Practice Through
a Technology-Based Approach to Teaching and Learning
Background to the Project
The Lone Star 2000 Project is a university-school system collaboration between the Duval
County Public Schools in Jacksonville, Florida, the Division of Curriculum and Instruction in the
College of Education and Human Services at the University of North Florida, and three business
partners, including the IBM Corporation, Logical Business Systems and MediaOne. Participants in
the fourth year of the project included six teachers from Lone Star Elementary School and
Sandalwood High School, three preservice teachers completing their internship through the
University of North Florida, a supervising professor, a technology education trainer, and technical
support personnel from the business partners.
The primary goals of the project include:
To build a community of learners which effect real change in the teaching and learning
process;
To create exemplary classrooms which make educational technologies available to K-12
students;
To educate K-12 students in selected areas of curriculum using educational technologies and
document their work through electronic portfolios;
To prepare selected preservice teachers in new approaches to teaching and learning with
educational technologies;
To strengthen the link between partner school participants, including K-12 educators,
parents, students, school volunteers, university faculty, preservice teachers, and business
partners; and,
To connect the sites with distance education technology enabling participants to contribute
to the renewal of K-12 education and teacher education.
Currently in its fifth year of operation, the project has emerged as an effective model for successfully
infusing technology into classroom teaching and learning with a measurable, positive impact on
student achievement.
The Process of the Project
This presentation details the process used to carry out the goals of the Lone Star 2000 Project and
describes the use of traditional and non-traditional assessment methods to evaluate progress toward
the goals. Steps in the process are as follows:
- Exposure to classroom, curriculum-based technologies
- Knowledge of IBM technology, including hardware and software use
- Application of technologies with students in the classroom
- Integration of technology usage with existing classroom curriculum
- Infusion of technologies into classroom teaching and learning which results in a positive
impact on the development of preservice teacher competencies and student learning.
Exposure to the IBM curriculum-based courseware as the first step in the process is
accomplished with the preservice teachers during the early weeks of their intern teaching experience.
They receive background information on the project and view samples of the technology-based
curriculum which they will use to facilitate student learning.
Knowledge of the IBM hardware and operation of the software is addressed during three
days of concentrated, hands-on training for the preservice teachers. The training takes place at the
school site and addresses the following skills: effective use of the IBM computers and related
technology devices, including CD-ROM and large screen projection equipment for use in whole-
class computer instruction; efficient use of specific mathematics, science, language arts and social
studies courseware designated as the target curriculum emphasis in Lone Star's School Improvement
Plan; ability to use the LinkWay Live electronic presentation program to create electronic preservice
teacher portfolios and student electronic portfolios, detailing knowledge of specific subject areas,
as well as demonstrating the use of technology; foundation knowledge and hands-on participation
in IBM's Teaching and Learning With Computers (TLC) approach to instruction which emphasizes
a) cooperative learning in a variety of learning centers, b) networked classroom-based curriculum
courseware as an integral part of teaching and learning, and c) active discovery-based learning with
the teacher as guide and facilitator.
Application of technology use in the classroom occurs as the interns begin utilizing
computers, large screen projection devices, and specific courseware to teach whole-class lessons to
their students, as they teach the students how to operate the educational technology, and use specific
courseware programs. This is followed by individual and small-group, hands-on learning sessions
at the computers, guided by the teaching interns. As the interns practice with the technologies and
begin creating LinkWay Live folders, detailing information and pictures of their internship, their
experience and enthusiasm is shared with the students, who they assist in creating their individual
electronic portfolios. The directing teachers are active participants with the preservice teachers and
model daily behaviors for technology use in teaching and learning activities during the beginning
weeks of the internship experience.
Integration is the crucial step in which technology and curriculum are joined to strengthen
and enhance instruction. Integration of technology into the classroom is accomplished when the
preservice teacher is guided to create and teach lessons that utilize the technology in conjunction
with existing curriculum materials by presenting subject matter in unique, creative ways that enhance
student learning outcomes. A key factor to success in this phase is the flexibility of the IBM
curriculum courseware that allows them to design their own personalized instructional plans, based
on their knowledge of it and the needs of their individual students. Rogers indicates that adoption
of technology is an active process where success depends, in large part, on "the degree to which an
innovation is changed or modified by a user in the process of it's adoption and implementation".
While the degree of technology integration has varied among classrooms and grade levels during
this project, it has been influenced by the "ownership" factor, as well as by critical success factors
mentioned later in this presentation.
Infusion of technology into classroom teaching and learning is the true indicator of the
success of this model project. An important part of this project is achieved when the preservice
teacher has departed and the classroom teacher continues to develop their own instructional plans,
utilizing the curriculum, and incorporating technology usage into daily teaching and learning
activities for the purpose of improving student learning outcomes.
Research-base for the Project
The work of Reeves provides a useful foundation for identifying four critical success factors
that are used as benchmarks for the Lone Star 2000 Project.
- Clearly defined goals for the project were identified (listed at the beginning of the
presentation). Reeves states that "Technology infusion as well as other restructuring
activities should be driven by clear goals." Goals for this project involved "authentic
achievement" for preservice teachers in the form of portfolios, videos, electronic
presentations, and so forth. Newman (1991) also supports the approach in the project by
suggesting that "Rather than reproducing knowledge, students should be involved in
producing knowledge, through discourse, through the creation of things, and through
performance."
- Thorough documentation in all phases of the Lone Star 2000 Project provides an
understanding of where we started, where we are, and where we are going. Reeves
states that "Documentation attempts to capture all the changes that occur in the process of
reform so that interested participants can understand what is really occurring." Examples
are provided in the Project Outcomes section of this presentation.
- Formative experimentation is defined by Newman as follows "In a formative
experiment, the researcher sets a pedagogical goal and finds out what it takes in terms of
materials, organization or changes in the technology to reach the goal." The Lone Star 2000
Project has adapted and restructured over the four year period to incorporate new knowledge
and improved methods for meeting the project goals.
- Impact evaluation is defined by Reeves as "attempts to assess the effects of innovative
instructional practices on factors such as organization, climate, teacher and student
self-perceptions, parental and community aspirations, and numerous other difficult-to-
measure
factors." The Lone Star 2000 Project uses traditional and non-traditional methods of
assessment to measure progress toward goals. (These are described in the Project Outcomes
section below).
The critical success factors which follow are based on research by Rogers that
revealed three ways in which adoption of interactive communication innovations differ from
similar processes with other kinds of new ideas or tools.
Critical mass of adopters
The Lone Star 2000 Project began with two very interested teachers and two interns as a
core group to influence and persuade school personnel to get involved. Rogers states that
"the usefulness of a new communication system increases for all adopters with each
additional adopter." Over 760 students and 26 teaching interns have participated in the
project over the past five years.
Degree of use
Continued, supported use of the technology was critical to its eventual classroom
infusion and diffusion to other users. Rogers believes that "The degree of use of a
communications innovation rather than the decision to adopt it, is the dependent variable
that will indicate the success of the diffusion effort."
Re-invention of the innovations is defined by Rogers as "The degree to which an innovation
is changed or modified by a user in the process of its adoption and implementation."
Infusion of the technology into classrooms in the Lone Star 2000 project took place when
teachers and interns were able to successfully design and implement instructional activities
using the educational technologies that met their own specific needs and those of their
students.
Project Outcomes
Outcomes for this project are detailed below and include traditional and non-traditional
methods of assessment.
Traditional methods for measuring learning outcomes in this project included:
- Grade reports of the preservice teachers and students
- Formal and informal observations
Multiple observations were conducted for each preservice teacher during the
course of their internship experience by the directing teachers from the school
and the supervising professor from the University.
- Standardized test results
Test scores for students at Lone Star were compared for classrooms with and
without significant amounts of technology use and integration with instruction. The results indicated that students in classrooms with the
technology scored better on the nationally-normed Comprehensive Test of
Basic Skills (CTBS) than students in the classrooms without the technology.
Non-traditional assessment instruments included:
- Journals (process portfolios)
The preservice teachers produced daily journals of their teaching experiences
in the classroom, the educational technology training they received, how the
IBM software integrated with the curriculum at their grade level. The also
reported on how they implemented their knowledge of educational
technology in the classroom for instruction and how it related to Florida's
Sunshine Standards.
- Videotaped lessons
The preservice teachers produced videos of their delivery of student
classroom
instruction using technology. Their videos were used for formative
assessment as well as product outcomes to demonstrate their effective
use of technology to enhance classroom teaching and learning.
- Electronic student portfolios (product portfolio)
Each preservice teacher and their students created electronic portfolios with
LinkWay Live that used text, sound, and graphics to illustrate their
knowledge of various subject matter learned in science, language arts,
reading, mathematics, and social studies, as well as their increased knowledge
of the use of technology and specific software programs.
- Interview questionnaire for directing teachers, principals and teaching interns
The questionnaire included topics such as: their level of comfort in using
the technologies; responses of students to the technology in attitude and
performance; observations of parent reactions to the student's technology
use; degree to which the IBM software assisted interns in delivering
instruction in various curriculum areas.
- Successful job placement for interns in the project
To date, the preservice teachers in the project have all found teaching
positions within the first semester after graduation.
- Increased number of classrooms using educational technology for increased amounts of time.
- Student self-assessment attitude surveys
- Parent/volunteer logs and activity sign-in sheets
Increased parent involvement was demonstrated by participation in special
training for parent technology volunteers and in their
subsequent hours providing classroom assistance. Also, a
Technology Night which showcased Lone Star student's
electronic portfolios was attended by over 100 parents.
- Business partner funding was received for software, hardware, fiber optic cable, and
considerable technical support.
- Increased number of technology grants applied for and received
Based on documentation of the positive results of evaluations from the
previous years and a clear implementation plan, project participants were
successful in applying for and receiving education grants to further this
technology project.
- Creation of a CD-ROM of an intern presentation portfolio.
- Established distance learning connections between the Educational Technology
Center at the University, the science resource room at Lone Star Elementary
School and a Science classroom at Sandalwood High School.
- Completed four distance learning demonstrations between the university and the
school sites. ( http://www.unf.edu/coehs/cpbgrant/)
- Sandalwood High school students made science presentations to students at Lone
Star. Lone Star students visited Sandalwood's science classroom to participate in
science learning experiences.
Conclusion
The Lone Star 2000 Project has enabled participants to establish that educational technologies are
powerful and effective teaching and learning tools. We also learned that university and public school
personnel, working together within partnership schools can help bring barriers down, develop
visions, change perspectives, and become open to permanent change.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Berliner, David C., & Calfee, Robert C. (1995). Looking at technology in context: A framework
for understanding technology and education research. Handbook of Educational
Psychology. New York: Macmillian Publishing.
- Claxton, Cheryl, Dresch, Lynda, Ley, Mary, McAllister, Paula, Myrick, Marilyn, & Nottke,
Scharyle (1996). Reference Site Profile for Lone Star Elementary School. A report
prepared for the IBM Corporation and the Duval County Public School District. July,
1996.
- Evans, Donna B., & Fountain, Cheryl A. (1994). Beyond shared rhetoric: A collaborative
change model for integrating preservice and inservice urban educational delivery
systems. Journal of Teacher Education, 45 (3), 218 - 227.
- Fountain, Cheryl A. (1994). Alliance for Tomorrow's Teachers Report. A paper prepared for
the AT&T Foundation in association with the American Association of Colleges for
Teacher Education. August, 1994.
- Gerstner, Louis V. Jr., Semead, Rodger D., Doyle, Dennis Philip & Johnson, William B. (1994).
Reinventing Education: Entrepreneurship in America's Public Schools. New York:
Penguin Books USA, Inc.
- Goodlad, John I. (1994). Educational Renewal: Better Teachers, Better Schools. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Harris, Judi (1996) . Facilitator's Guide for teaching and Learning with the Internet. Alexandria,VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Holt, Dennis M., Ludwick, Karen, & McAllister, Paula (1996). Lone Star 2000: Documenting
successful school or university teaching and learning. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, October, 1996. (http://www.thejournal.com/past/oct/1096feat3.html)
- Holt, Dennis M. & McAllister, Paula (1997). Lone Star 2000: Soaring into the future with
technology. Resources in Education. ED400780 (http://ericae.net/db/riecije/ed400780
.html)
- Newman, F.M. (1991). Linking restructuring to authentic student achievement. Phi Delta
Kappan, 72,458-463.
- Osguthorpe, Russel T., Harris, Carl R., Harris, Melanie Fox, & Black, Sharon (Editors) (1995).
Partner Schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Reeves, Thomas C. (1992). Evaluating schools fused with technology. Education and Urban
Society, 24, (4), 519 - 534.
- Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
- Rogers, E.M. (1986) Communication Technology: The New Media in Society. New York: The
Free Press.
- Wishnietsky, Dan H. (Editor) (1994). Assessing the role of technology in education. Phi Delta
Kappa.