Contributing Task Force members:
Asai Asaithambi, Candice Carter, Georgette Dumont, Alice Eng, Lakshmi Goel,
Saurabh Gupta, Alan Harris, Wanda Hedrick, Julie Ingersoll, Jennifer Kane, Philip
Kaplan, Tammie Johnson, Peter Magyari, Lauren Newton, Richard Patterson,
Richard Phillips, Zornitza Prodanoff, Katherine Robinson, Diane Tanner, Lance
Taylor. Chair: Scott Hochwald
The following resolution was the raison d’être
for the committee.
on Distance Learning Faculty
Association has grave concerns about the speed, origin, and direction of recent
Distance Learning directives. Such directives are issued with little (if
any) consultation with faculty. The faculty voices on the Distance Learning
committee have been side-stepped by having decisions presented to committee
members rather than being made by votes at committee meetings. The
directives are being presented to faculty without explanation as to their
origination and without explicit votes of support from the Distance Learning
committee or other faculty governance body. In addition, the directives
do not seem to be merely the procedural implementation of university policies
but rather have implications that affect every faculty member’s right and
responsibility to design his or her courses according to his or her
disciplinary and pedagogical expertise. More specifically, the directives
impose restrictions, to which UNF faculty have never formally agreed, on course
delivery models and related pedagogical and curricular decisions. We are
also gravely concerned that a unit whose mission is to support faculty has
become a unit that seeks to evaluate faculty outside of evaluative process
delineated in the collective bargaining agreement.
therefore, be it resolved that the UNF Faculty Association calls for:
1. Certification of both faculty and courses.
2. The role of CIRT
CIRT staff should provide DL advice,
support, and training for faculty. As stated in their mission statement, the
role of CIRT is ”to offer expertise,
resources, and training to assist faculty in ways that enable them to develop
greater capacities for using technology for teaching and research. CIRT also
disseminates ideas, frameworks, and materials that apply pedagogical knowledge
to the teaching and learning process.” CIRT
should also incentivize the use of teaching technology by faculty in all modes
of instruction. We believe this is best
accomplished by giving faculty stipends to actively participate in workshops in
which they learn how to use teaching technology appropriate to their
disciplines. Additionally, CIRT should continue to provide support for faculty
in as timely a manner as needed.
The DL Committee should
consist of two faculty representatives from each College except for the College
of Arts and Sciences. That College will
have four faculty representatives. The Associate
VP for Academic Technology and Innovation should be an ex officio non-voting
member of the Committee. The Associate
VP for Academic Technology and Innovation can bring advisors to DL Committee
meetings. The Chair of the Committee
will be one of the faculty representatives and will be elected by the faculty
representatives. The newly formed DL Committee
should draft bylaws that reflect the reality that faculty are at the center of
4. Allocation of the DL Fee.
fee should be used to fund three categories.
Those categories are: student needs, faculty needs, and infrastructure. The DL Committee will review on an annual
basis DL fee allocations in previous years and solicit input from stakeholders
as to current DL needs. The Committee
will then make recommendations for the allocation of the DL fee for the
upcoming year. At the end of each fee
year the DL Committee will issue an accountability report detailing how the
fees were actually used. The members of
the DL Committee will share all reports with their respective Colleges. 5. DL Office Hours
DL Office Hours should
be held in the medium that is best for students. This could be in a faculty office or in a
remote location where technology is used to conduct synchronous meetings. The total number of office hours will be
determined by the collective bargaining agreement.
6. DL Class Size
size should be set with the overall quality of the course as a guide. In many cases DL courses require roughly the
same or even more time spent by the instructor per student than face-to-face
courses. In general caps for online and
face-to-face courses should be comparable.
If there is a need for online caps to exceed face-to-face caps, then
additional teaching credit should be awarded proportional to the class size in
an equitable manner.
(coaches) are needed for DL courses, then the duties of those assistants will
be formulated by the instructors of the DL courses. The instructors requesting assistants will
submit their proposals to their Chairs.
The Chairs in turn will prioritize the assistant needs of their
Departments and forward those recommendations to their Deans. The Deans will determine the allocations for
assistants. The DL fee should be used to
adequately fund faculty assistant needs as informed by this process.
testing of students is a major concern.
It is imperative that the integrity of the testing process is
assured. Faculty should have the
autonomy to decide how their students are tested. Since a significant number of DL students are
in Jacksonville, a Testing Center should be created at UNF using DL fees that
will accommodate the projected number of students who could be tested locally.
9. Student Support
a 24-7 site for student support. This
needs to be planned by the DL Committee and funded by the DL fee.
Copyright © 2017 University of North Florida1 UNF Drive | Jacksonville, FL 32224 | Phone: (904) 620-1000
Regulations | Consumer InformationWebsite Accessibility |