Agenda Item# 1 - FA 08-15: Submitted by the Academic Programs Committee
College of Arts and Sciences
Undergraduate – Biology (APC 1 & 3 – 2 items)
Graduate – Biology (APC 1&3 – 4 items)
Item was moved by Arturo Sάnchez-Ruỉz
The item passed.
Agenda Item# 2 - FA 08-16: Submitted by the Academic Programs Committee
Coggin College of Business
Undergraduate – Accounting and Finance (APC 1– 1 item)
Item was moved by Arturo Sάnchez-Ruỉz
The item passed.
Agenda Item# 3 - FA 08-17: Submitted by the Academic Programs Committee
College of Education and Human Services
Undergraduate – Childhood Education (APC 1, 2, & 3 – 4 items)
Undergraduate – Exceptional Student & Deaf Education (APC 2 – 12 items)
Item was moved by Arturo Sάnchez-Ruỉz
Question/comment from Mike Smith (COEHS) concerned item 07/08-344 EDG 4XXX: Mike Smith teaches art education in foundations of secondary education and is speaking against this item. Faculty who submitted the APC together are not qualified to teach the course. The APC forms also state that no new resources will be needed to teach these courses. When at least two and sometimes three sections will be needed every semester, if the proposed instructors are released to teach this course, other faculty will be required to teach other courses. Mike Smith believes that this item should be sent back so to resolve resource and faculty concerns be resolved.
From Candace Carter: They stated they are qualified to teach these courses, and they have terminal degrees. They have good reason to believe that the State will require elementary majors to have a special education course in their program. A new course covering combined music and art was needed to cover this.
From Judy Solano: Judy made a motion to divide this item into 2 APCs – separating item 07/08-344 from items 345, 346, and 347. The motion was seconded.
Motion to separate the items passed.
Continued discussion for item 07/08-344:
Question from Debra Murphy: What does a terminal degree in the arts mean---visual arts, or language art?
Response from Mike Smith: A terminal degree in art education is a PhD in art education. A terminal degree in music education is a PhD in music education.
Response: A terminal degree in art for undergraduate courses is a master’s degree.
Question from Debra Murphy: Are other universities in the state combining their courses?
UF has had their course combined for last 8 to 10 years. UCF has had their program combined for a few years.
Question from Tayeb Guima: Are Dr. Smith and these two ladies in the same department?
Response from Mike Smith: No. The reorganization split them into separate units.
Question from Chris Rasche: Is the question over course merits or the resources available to teach the course?
Response from Mike Smith: The objection is two issues. The faculty are not qualified (resource issue), and COEHS created this course to make room for other courses.
Clarification from Chris Rasche: Is the primary issue that the resources do not exist in the department to teach the course?
Response from Mike Smith: Yes. And lack of qualified faculty are problem also.
Response from Larry Daniels: He respectively disagrees and thinks he has qualified faculty in the Department of Childhood Education. Faculty also extended an invitation to be involved in the course development. He welcomes Mike Smith’s input in the future planning of this course.
Response from Mike Smith: He was not involved in the development of the new course. The APC form was signed by the Dean under the impression that he had been consulted.
Response from Larry Daniels: He asked the question of whether the other faculty had been consulted and he was told the course had not been completed planned. Dr. Carter from the CE department extended opportunities to participate. As the course is rolled out over the next few months, Dr. Smith will be involved with this.
Chris Rasche comment: Because it sounds as if there is some disagreement, a motion is made to send it back to APC committee. Seconded by Tayeb Guima.
Comment from Arturo Sάnchez-Ruỉz: Discussions such as this should have taken place in other parts of the APC process before it gets to the Association floor. APC meetings are open to all and are the best forum for discussions, and there should be plenty of discussion prior to getting this point.
Comment from Len Roberson: As chair of the UG APC committee in his college, public meetings are held and opportunity to participate exists.
Item passed to be sent back to committee.
Motion by Kathy Brown to send the other three items (07/08-345, 346, and 347) back to committee since without 07/08-344, they don’t make a lot of sense.
A friendly amendment was accepted and 344, 345, 346, and 347 will be sent back.
Motion made by Arturo Sάnchez-Ruỉz for items 07/08-332 to 343.
Question from Judy Solano: Will these require new faculty and new resources?
Response from Candace Carter: No.
Item passed the forms of the Exceptional Student and Deaf Education..
Agenda Item# 4 - FA 08-18: Submitted by the Academic Programs Committee
Brooks College of Health
Undergraduate – Public Health (APC 3 – 2 items)
Undergraduate – School of Nursing (APC 2 – 1 item)
Graduate – School of Nursing (APC 2 – 1 item)
Motion made by Arturo Sάnchez-Ruỉz.
Item passed.
Agenda Item# 5 - FA 08-19: Submitted by the Academic Standards Committee
“Satisfactory Academic Progress” from The Graduate School
Item moved by Judy Solano.
Item passed.
|