|
Item #1 -- FA 02-10: Submitted by the Executive Committee.
Bylaws Amendment First Reading
No action today.
Item #2 -- FA 02-11: Submitted by the Academic Programs Committee
College of Arts and Sciences
Biology Department
The item was moved by Len Roberson. The item passed.
Item #3 FA 0212: Submitted by the Academic Programs
Committee
College of Education and Human Services
Curriculum & Instruction
The item was moved by Len Roberson. The item passed.
Item #4 FA 0213: Submitted by the
Academic Programs Committee
College of Health
Nursing Department
The item was moved by Len Roberson. The item passed.
Item #5 FA 0214: Submitted by the Academic Programs
Committee
Honors Program
The item was moved by Len Roberson. Dale Clifford
offered a friendly amendment to correct a spelling error. The Committee
accepted the amendment.
The item passed.
Item #6 FA 0215: Submitted by the Academic Programs
Committee
College of Arts and Sciences
New Degree
The item was moved by Len Roberson.
The item passed.
Item #7 FA 02-16: Submitted by the Faculty Affairs Committee
Revision of Rule #4 for Use of the Faculty Commons
Judy Solano moved the item. The item passed.
Item #8 FA 02-17: Submitted by the Faculty
Affairs Committee
Revision of the Outstanding Undergraduate Teaching Award Procedures
Selection by the University Selection Committee
Judy Solano moved the item.
Scott Hochwald asked for clarification of the revision.
It is proposed that the University Selection Committee
no longer select the person to represent the University in the Carnegie
Foundation Professor of the Year Award Competition. Judy Solano
explained that the criteria for the Carnegie Award is totally different
from the Outstanding Teaching Awards and therefore UNF's representatives
are not competitive and have not been successful. The Committee
wanted to do something for the faculty like Mary Borg does for students.
She and David Jaffee would be assigned the task of finding awards
and publicizing them to the faculty who could self-nominate. They
would then help applicants prepare submission packets.
Dr. Kline suggested that David Jaffee and Mary
Borg could do that. The award process could be put in their hands
and removed from the Outstanding Teacher process. There would be
a process so that people could submit packets and receive help with
their submission packets.
Faiz Al-Rubaee asked who would decide what faculty
packet will go forward?
Judy Solano responded that the Committee planned
to work with David Jafee and Mary Borg to make sure there is some
kind of selection process.
Len Lipkin said there are two very different issues
here. One is the question of removing this process from the committee.
The other one, though, he finds very strange that a university
would forward faculty for national awards with no structure, no
committee. It would be in the hands of two people who could possibly
resign the next year. He feels there should be a committee structure.
Faiz Al Rubaee said it is an excellent idea to
involve other offices but there is no proposed procedure. He wants
to know the role of the faculty. How will the selection be made?
Dr. Hopkins noted that if UNF ever wants to win
any national faculty awards, there must be a campaign to do that.
The problem is that each award has a different criteria and set
procedures will not work with every one. The University will not
want to submit a candidate for every award every year. She reiterated
that she wanted UNF to win some of these big awards.
Chris Rasche said the current structure is not
working. She feels we must change the procedure and it should be
changed before the next cycle to take it out of the current teaching
awards. That is the first step. The next step will be figuring out
how to replace the process for each of the other kinds of awards.
She noted that this particular item only speaks to taking out the
part that is not working.
Royal Van Horn said he was confused about what
the Faculty Affairs Committee was trying to do. Judy Solano said
there is an entire document on guidelines for the Outstanding Undergraduate
Teaching Awards. Each college is allowed to send nominees. A College
sends nominees, the University committee selects. One of the roles
of the University Selection Committee was that after the seven winners
were selected, one of the seven was selected to be submitted as
the Carnegie Award nominee. Chris Rasche said that duty was sort
of tacked on. It was a way to pick someone to send to the Carnegie
competition. Now people realize that is not working.
Bill Wilson said he could accept the change if
it was added that the Faculty Affairs Committee would come up with
a proposed procedure. Judy Solano said that was their intent all
along.
Judy Solano said she kept referring to what Mary
Borg is doing because she has the model. We can work with that model
and plan how to structure this.
Scott Hochwald asked people to vote against the
change until the new guidelines are proposed.
Dr. Kline commented that the University needs to
come up with a procedure that is pretty generic so it can work with
all awards.
Judy Solano said we need to be able to identify
awards and then find a mechanism to select candidates to submit
packets.
The item passed.
Item #9 FA 02-18: Submitted by the Faculty Affairs Committee
Administration of Student Instructional Report (SIR) Assessment
Questionnaire
Judy Solano moved the item.
Royal Van Horn spoke against the measure. He feels
it makes it particularly difficult for small departments who have
smaller budgets to be in the process. He said there should be some
test of national norms and we should be striving to do more of this,
not cancel support for it.
Al Tilley said that in support of the non-tenured
faculty in his department he wanted to keep SIR evaluations.
Dale Clifford wondered if results of a test of
national norms could play any role at all in advancing in some kind
of national award.
Chris Rasche asked how many departments are now using the instrument.
Kathy Hughes said there were three departments 30 courses.
Judy Solano said that the campus cannot legally
use the SIR I anymore. Duplicating the test is illegal, and we cannot
continue that practice. If we want to use the test we will have
to purchase the SIR II.
Pat Plumlee wondered who would pay the cost?
A voice vote was unsatisfactory. A vote count was
necessary. The item failed.
Item #10 FA 02-19: Submitted by the Faculty Affairs Committee
Bylaws Revision First Reading
No action is taken on a first reading.
Kathleen Cohen said she wanted to direct faculty
attention to the proposed revision as it will affect how we do promotion
and tenure in the future. Scott Hochwald asked if this would be
voted on in the summer?
Judy Solano said the bylaws say that we can vote
on an item in the summer but if there is no quorum, in the fall
a member can ask to bring it back.
The next meeting will be the time to discuss the
item.
Dennis Gay said he cannot be here. He questions
why this cannot be discussed today.
Royal Van Horn asked if the rules can be suspended?
There was a motion to suspend the rules.
It was noted that it takes a 2/3 vote to suspend
the rules.
The motion to suspend the rules passed.
Scott Hochwand moved that the first reading be
deferred until September.
The motion passed. The item will be deferred.
Item #11 FA 02-20: Submitted by the Faculty Association
President
2002-2003 Faculty Association Budget
Judy Solano moved the item. Cheryl Frohlich offered
a friendly amendment. She asked for a 10% reduction which would
be consistent with budget reductions throughout the campus. That
would be a reduction of $2,200 instead of $1,000. Kathleen Cohen
accepted the friendly amendment.
The item passed.
|