Candidate Assessment System (CAS) Information

In 2003 the College of Education and Human Services (COEHS) implemented an electronic data collection tool to track the progress and proficiency of preservice teacher candidates on professional, state, and program standards. This electronic repository of data allows for the storage and recall of data for each candidate including but not limited to pre-admission assessments, admissions profile, critical performance task assessments, candidate portfolios, and end-of-program summative measures. At the end of each term reports are produced from which to assess the strengths and weaknesses of candidates and to the quality of the programs offered in the College, and the progress of the unit.

The COEHS assessment system is grounded on “Critical Tasks.” These critical performance tasks are embedded in courses and the assessment of proficiency remains the same despite the instructor assigned to the course. In doing so, critical tasks have become the means by which the Unit monitors and assesses the most significant outcomes in a program of study. Examples of critical tasks include: portfolios, group and individual presentations, reflective essays, examinations, lesson and unit planning activities, practicum observations, case studies, etc.

Frequently Asked Questions
Candidate Assessment System

  1. What are the purposes of the CAS?
    • NCATE Continuous Accreditation (standard 2).
    • Meet FLDOE criteria for approval of teacher preparation programs (Rule 6A-5.066).
    • Track and document students’ progress via integrated set of evaluative measures (i.e., critical tasks) linked to state, national, and/or other professional standards.
    • Unit performance evaluation and decision-making.
       
  2. What are the key elements of CAS?
    • Critical tasks are the backbone of our assessment system and are used to assess students’ mastery of specific accomplished practices, other standards and their respective indicators.
    • Assessment scale (U, T, E) based upon rubrics are used to document students’ proficiency on AP’s, and other standards.
    • Report options.
       
  3. How do students meet standards?
    • Competency is demonstrated through critical tasks which are linked to one or more standards.
    • Each critical task has its own rubric to measure competency on the standards.
    • Students demonstrate competency three times during the program. Twice during the program and a third time during internship.
       
  4. What is the timeline for critical tasks during the term?
    • First two weeks in a term—Notification of critical tasks for active courses.
    • End of the Term—Data collection, entry, and processing.
       
  5. At what point in the semester can student data be submitted?
    • Students’ data can be submitted at any time during the term.
       
  6. How can the number of critical tasks and/or its content be changed?
    • The system is flexible enough to allow for frequent revisions of critical tasks. However, changes need to be approved by the program chair. Once approval is obtained changes are incorporated into the database.
    • Changes should be submitted at least four to five weeks into the term in order to become active no later than by the end of the term.
       
  7. What happens if a student fails to demonstrate competency on a given critical task(s)?
    • This is a high-stakes system. Students need to successfully complete critical task(s) assignment to receive a passing grade for the course.
    • Successful completion of a critical task does not ensure a passing grade in a course, but failing a critical task will result in a failing grade for the associated class.
       
  8. What safety nets are in place for students not completing critical task(s) assignments by the end of the term?
    • Remediation implies the student did not master a critical task or tasks prior to the end of the semester. In this case, because the student failed to remediate in time for grade posting, the student receives a failing grade for the course until remediation is completed.
    • Professors complete a remediation form that outlines a action plan to remediate the student.
       

Papers Presented on CAS Development: