For those graduate programs that do not have discipline-specific accreditation, an "embedded assessment approach" focused on whatever capstone products the program generates (such as thesis, dissertations, comprehensive examinations, and portfolios) is recommended.
The faculty members charged with guiding and reviewing these capstone products can develop rubrics based on their program's GALC statements. These rubrics can be completed by these faculty members — for instance, a thesis committee — at the time of the products' review and evaluation.
For those graduate programs lacking both discipline-specific accreditation and capstone experiences, these programs should work with the university's assessment officer on the development of an assessment strategy that meets their needs and that the program faculty find meaningful and useful.